Can social media lead to labor market discrimination?
Listen to this article
A new Journal of Economics & Management Strategy study investigates whether social media may be used as a source of information for recruiters to discriminate against job applicants.
What the researchers say: For the study, researchers set up an experiment that involved sending more than 800 applications from two fictitious applicants who differed in their cities of origin, a typical French town (Brives-la-Gaillarde) or Marrakesh, Morocco. This information is available only on their Facebook profiles, not on the resumes or the cover letters sent to recruiters. The investigators selected job openings published in over several months on the French public agency for employment website Pôle emploi.
A significant 41.7% gap between the two applicants’ callback rates highlighted that personal online profiles are used by recruiters as a source of information to discriminate against applicants of foreign origin.
During the experiment, the Facebook default layout changed as Facebook introduced sub-tabs within profiles. This change reduced the salience of the information related to the applicants’ language spoken. After the layout change, the difference in callback rates faded away. This suggests that the screening conducted by the employers does not go beyond the main pages of profiles. It also indicates that design choices made by online platforms, such as which information is displayed and how it is displayed, may have important consequences on the extent of discrimination.
“This study illustrates that design choices made by online platforms can dramatically affect a decision like calling back, or not, an applicant for a job interview. Internet companies should integrate this fact into their design thinking,” said the lead author.
So, what? That employers should be allowed to do this is extraordinary in itself. Even more extraordinary is the lack of scientific rigor in recruiting. Any geneticist can tell you that there is no genetic difference between someone born in France or Morocco in terms of ability, intelligence, motivation or any of the traits that employers are looking for.
And don’t get me started on the use of psychometrics to judge the personality or ability of a potential recruit. As I have said before, they have no scientific validity whatsoever when used for that purpose.
Join the discussion
More from this issue of TR
You might be interested inBack to Today's Research
Gender and collaboration in high performing teams
A team led by a researcher who customarily studies nonhuman primate behavior has found that humans working in operating rooms (ORs) follow the same general primate patterns of hierarchy and gender. Their findings are relevant to the construction of high performing teams in any business
Income inequality fuels status anxiety and sexualization
We are predisposed to trust men who are taller, better looking and with deeper voices and women who are taller than average, regarded as beautiful and who also have deeper voices (anyone remember Fenella Fielding?), so I think that men and women have been trying to preserve or improve their looks for longer than we have had the present economic system.
Have more women on boards to ensure consumer safety
Boards that include women may be more responsive to a diverse set of stakeholders, including at-risk customers. Boards do not make the recall decisions, but instead they set the tone and expectations for how managers are to make these decisions.
Join our tribe
Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.