Being in company boosts creativity
Listen to this article
So many studies are now showing that working from home on a regular basis is bad for the individual, their family and the organization that employs them. This study adds to that growing list.
We process language differently depending on whether we are reading alone or in the company of another person, according to the study published in the journal Cortex.
The results of recording electrical activity in the brain indicated that when we read in company, our language processing is more heuristic, i.e. more global, controlled, integrated and more creative.
What the researchers say: “However, when we read alone, our language processing is more algorithmic, in other words, more automatic, limited and subject to rules”, explained the lead author.
To compare the effect of company and solitude on language comprehension, the researchers measured electrical brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG).
Participants read texts containing syntactic or semantic errors, half of them in solitude and the other half in company. Those reading in company showed activity in the precuneus, an area of the brain involved in social and attentional processing. In addition, their language comprehension was more global and integrated compared with that of subjects reading alone.
In the social situation, syntactic errors elicited a pattern of electrical activity characteristic of processing which is considered more heuristic and integrated. However, electrical brain activity in subjects reading alone showed a pattern characteristic of early, automatic processing. This lower level processing inhibited creativity and ingenuity.
The social isolation caused by the current coronavirus pandemic has created an unprecedented opportunity, prompting researchers to change perspective and conduct more research into social aspects of behavior and language comprehension.
“Given that company favors a more creative and integrated understanding whereas isolation leads to more detailed and systematic processing, we need to start thinking more about the impact of social interaction in research, in education and in professional settings where language comprehension is fundamental”, concluded the researchers.
So, what? Working in isolation was increasing before COVID-19 hit the stage. Driven largely by cost pressures, employers were encouraging work away from the office, hot desking, and similar arrangements. The virus has driven this process further and faster than anyone could’ve imagined.
This is dangerous for any science-based or professional service organization which relies on the creativity, ingenuity and clear thinking of its employees.
Incidentally a story in the Australian Financial Review claims that Australians working from home spent AU$2 billion setting up their home offices. That represents quite a saving to businesses.
Join the discussion
More from this issue of TR
Rising stress, depression in US linked to pandemic-related losses, media consumption
New research highlights the connection between mental health and exposure to media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the need to step away from the television, computer or smartphone to protect psychological well-being.
Being in company boosts creativity
So many studies are now showing that working from home on a regular basis is bad for the individual, their family and the organization that employs them.
You might be interested inBack to Today's Research
Fake news makes disease outbreaks worse
What the researchers say: “Fake news is manufactured with no respect for accuracy, and is often based on conspiracy theories,” he said. “Worryingly, research has shown that nearly 40 per cent of the British public believe at least one conspiracy theory, and even more in the US. When it comes to COVID-19, there has been a lot of speculation, misinformation and fake news circulating on the internet—about how the virus originated, what causes it and how it is spread.”
Research shows focus groups can work with or without a moderator
This research reveals how taking potential biases of a moderator out of the room, can focus on what the group really thinks about an issue. Also, would people actually talk? Would they stay ‘on topic’? Would the participants feel comfortable with the situation?
Under pressure, people tell us what we want to hear
When asked to answer questions quickly and impulsively, people tend to respond with socially desirable answers rather than an honest ones. Under time pressure, people may default to their desire to appear virtuous, even if it means misrepresenting themselves.
Join our tribe
Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.