Being in company boosts creativity
Listen to this article
So many studies are now showing that working from home on a regular basis is bad for the individual, their family and the organization that employs them. This study adds to that growing list.
We process language differently depending on whether we are reading alone or in the company of another person, according to the study published in the journal Cortex.
The results of recording electrical activity in the brain indicated that when we read in company, our language processing is more heuristic, i.e. more global, controlled, integrated and more creative.
What the researchers say: “However, when we read alone, our language processing is more algorithmic, in other words, more automatic, limited and subject to rules”, explained the lead author.
To compare the effect of company and solitude on language comprehension, the researchers measured electrical brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG).
Participants read texts containing syntactic or semantic errors, half of them in solitude and the other half in company. Those reading in company showed activity in the precuneus, an area of the brain involved in social and attentional processing. In addition, their language comprehension was more global and integrated compared with that of subjects reading alone.
In the social situation, syntactic errors elicited a pattern of electrical activity characteristic of processing which is considered more heuristic and integrated. However, electrical brain activity in subjects reading alone showed a pattern characteristic of early, automatic processing. This lower level processing inhibited creativity and ingenuity.
The social isolation caused by the current coronavirus pandemic has created an unprecedented opportunity, prompting researchers to change perspective and conduct more research into social aspects of behavior and language comprehension.
“Given that company favors a more creative and integrated understanding whereas isolation leads to more detailed and systematic processing, we need to start thinking more about the impact of social interaction in research, in education and in professional settings where language comprehension is fundamental”, concluded the researchers.
So, what? Working in isolation was increasing before COVID-19 hit the stage. Driven largely by cost pressures, employers were encouraging work away from the office, hot desking, and similar arrangements. The virus has driven this process further and faster than anyone could’ve imagined.
This is dangerous for any science-based or professional service organization which relies on the creativity, ingenuity and clear thinking of its employees.
Incidentally a story in the Australian Financial Review claims that Australians working from home spent AU$2 billion setting up their home offices. That represents quite a saving to businesses.
Join the discussion
More from this issue of TR
Romantic partners influence each other's goals
When one person within a couple avoids distress and conflicts, the other tries to do the same. And conversely, when one person seeks personal growth and meaningful experiences, the other wants to achieve them too.
Being in company boosts creativity
So many studies are now showing that working from home on a regular basis is bad for the individual, their family and the organization that employs them.
Rising stress, depression in US linked to pandemic-related losses, media consumption
New research highlights the connection between mental health and exposure to media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the need to step away from the television, computer or smartphone to protect psychological well-being.
You might be interested inBack to Today's Research
Some types of stress good for brain functioning? Maybe
Low to moderate levels of stress can help individuals develop resilience and cope with future stressful experiences, as well as reduce the risk of developing mental health disorders.
Brain networks more stable in intelligent individuals
New research ties IQ to brain functioning in areas of the brain connected with higher cognitive activity. Like the genetics of intelligence this is not amenable to “improvement” through education or training. You can train someone to use their IQ—or EQ or SQ—better or more creatively—but not increase it.
Join our tribe
Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.