Don't complain to these co-workers
Listen to this article
Conventional wisdom says it pays to speak up at work: When an employee offers a novel idea for workplace improvements, and managers listen and act, both the organization and employee win.
This is the reason that we have been asked by numerous organizations to help them establish a “speak-up culture.”
But new research finds much depends on whom those employees speak to.
In a recent paper, the researchers examined what factors make speaking up productive, by increasing the likelihood that a suggested change will get implemented or the complaint taken seriously. The lead author said that they found two characteristics of the listener that enhanced the effectiveness of speak up for both an employee and a business:
- Hierarchy: Having the authority and resources to make the change happen.
- Competence: Having the know-how to make the change happen.
What the researchers say: “Some employees make the mistake of speaking up to someone who is no higher in the hierarchy,” he said. “They target people who simply do not have the power or social standing to initiate effective change.”
Instead, the author suggests, employees should first consider whether they’re speaking to someone who can take the requested action:
- Employees should speak upward, to managers who have the authority and resources to address an issue. Speaking more frequently to bosses led to a 12%-15% increase in idea acceptance.
- Employees should avoid speaking sideways, to peers who have no more power than they have to fix underlying challenges. Speaking sideways was associated with a 10% decrease in the advancement of a suggestion or a complaint.
- If employees must speak sideways, they should target their most competent peers — those with the most knowledge and influence to help get ideas carried out.
“Employees should think critically about who they direct their voice to, when they have an idea for change,” the researchers said. “Both the amount of authority a person has to drive change and their competence give a greater likelihood of implementing the ideas employees raise, or the complaints being acted on.”
So, what? Speak up initiatives in organizations rarely work. It’s often left very unclear who employees should speak up to. Also there is a great deal of fear that speaking up to voice a complaint about bullying or harassment could be a bad career move.
Much of the training in this area encourages lower-level people to speak up, but does not train managers to listen. This defeats the whole object of the exercise.
Then there is manager bias. This comes into effect when managers reject ideas from those beneath them. The higher up in an organization, the more likely that leaders will only accept their own ideas, or those of peers or superiors.
Join the discussion
More from this issue of TR
Copy-cat? Youth with few friends conform to stay in a friend's 'good graces'
A network of support to a human is the fundamental criteria for having a sense of safety. That need is embedded in our DNA.
Don't complain to these co-workers
Employees should first consider whether they’re speaking to someone who can take the requested action.
You might be interested inBack to Today's Research
How bosses react influences whether workers speak up
How a leader responds to employee suggestions can impact whether or not the employee opens up in the future.
Acute stress may slow down the spread of fears
Stress changes the way we deal with risky information. Stressful events, such as a global pandemic, can influence how information and misinformation about health risks spreads in social networks.
Winning-at-all-costs in the workplace: Short-term gains could spell long-term disaster
Machiavellian employees tend to develop a bottom-line mentality more strongly when they perceive their management endorses bottom-line outcomes and were more likely to deviate from organizational norms, rules and practices.
Join our tribe
Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.