Living environment may be key to longevity
Listen to this article
When it comes to living to the ripe old age of 100 (my personal target is 115), good genes help but don’t tell the full story. Where you live has a significant impact on the likelihood that you will reach centenarian age, suggests a new study, which I obviously read with keen interest.
Published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and based on Washington State mortality data, the research team’s findings suggest that Washingtonians who live in highly walkable, mixed-age communities may be more likely to live to their 100th (or, in my case 115th) birthday. They also found socioeconomic status to be correlated, and an additional analysis showed that geographic clusters where the probability of reaching centenarian age is high are located in urban areas and smaller towns with higher socioeconomic status, including the Seattle area and the region around Pullman, Wash.
Sydney’s North Shore would also fit the bill, I suppose (disclosure: I live there).
What the researchers say: “Our study adds to the growing body of evidence that social and environmental factors contribute significantly to longevity, said the lead study author. Earlier research, he said, has estimated that heritable factors only explain about 20 to 35% of an individual’s chances of reaching centenarian age.
“We know from previous research that you can modify, through behavior, your susceptibility to different diseases based on your genetics,” explained the study’s co-author.
In other words, when you live in an environment that supports healthy aging, this likely impacts your ability to successfully beat your genetic odds through lifestyle changes. However, there was a gap in knowledge as to the exact environmental and social factors that make for an environment that best supports living to centenarian age, which this study helped to address.
The team looked at state-provided data about the deaths of nearly 145,000 Washingtonians who died at age 75 or older between 2011 and 2015. The data included information on each person’s age and place of residence at the time of death, as well as their sex, race, education level and marital status.
Based on where the person lived, the researchers used data from the American Community Survey, Environmental Protection Agency, and other sources to assign a value or score to different environmental variables for their neighborhood. The variables they looked at included poverty level, access to transit and primary care, walkability, percentage of working age population, rural-urban status, air pollution, and green space exposure. Subsequently, they conducted a survival analysis to determine which neighborhood and demographic factors were tied to a lower probability of dying before centenarian age.
They found that neighborhood walkability, higher socioeconomic status, and a high percentage of working age population (a measure of age diversity) were positively correlated with reaching centenarian status.
“These findings indicate that mixed-age communities are very beneficial for everyone involved,” said the researchers. “They also support the big push in growing urban centers toward making streets more walkable, which makes exercise more accessible to older adults and makes it easier for them to access medical care and grocery stores.” They added that neighborhoods that offer more age diversity tend to be in urban areas, where older adults are likely to experience less isolation and more community support.
Meanwhile, the lead author said, their findings also highlight the importance of continuing efforts to address health disparities experienced by racial minorities, such as African Americans and Native Americans. Consistent with previous research findings, for example, the data shows being white is correlated with living to 100.
Finally, the researchers wanted to see in which areas of the state people had a higher probability of reaching centenarian age. For each neighborhood, they calculated the years of potential life lost, or the average number of years deceased individuals would have had to continue living to reach age 100.
When they mapped the years of potential life lost for all neighborhoods across the state, they saw clusters with high likelihood of living to centenarian age in higher socioeconomic areas in urban centers and small towns across the state.
So, what? This a great study for a number of reasons. It points out the difference that inequality makes in the longevity stakes and the importance of green space in keeping us sane and well. At the moment, green space is disappearing and inequality is getting worse throughout the world. We need more wake-up calls like this.
Join the discussion
More from this issue of TR
Aiming for an enduring relationship
The spark of mutual attraction may remain a mystery but there’s a science to relationships that can help predict outcomes.
Living environment may be key to longevity
People living in highly walkable, mixed-age communities may be more likely to live to their 100th birthday. These neighborhoods are more likely to be located in urban areas and smaller towns with higher socioeconomic status.
You might be interested inBack to Today's Research
Governments should address climate change, health and taxes as one issue
Growing evidence shows that the costs of mitigating against climate change will more than pay off in the future through what scientists have called “health co-benefits.”
In the near future, unprecedented drought conditions are projected to be more frequent and consecutive in certain regions
It is critical to better understand when severe drought conditions expressed as “unprecedented” will become frequent.
Join our tribe
Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.