People may know the best decision - and not make it
Listen to this article
When faced with a decision, people may know which choice gives them the best chance of success, but still take the other option, a new study suggests. People may choose based on a “gut feeling,” a habit, or what worked for them last time, rather than on what they have learned will work most often, said one of the co-authors of the study.
What the researchers say: “In our study, people knew what worked most often. They just didn’t use that knowledge,” he said.
The research was published in the journal Nature Communications and is the work of a multinational team of researchers.
They gave an example of how the study’s findings may work in real life. Say Main Street is usually the fastest way home from work for you. But yesterday there was an event that was going to slow traffic on Main Street, so you took Spruce Street instead and it got you home a few minutes faster than normal.
Today, do you take Main Street—which you know is usually the better route—or take Spruce Street because it worked so well yesterday? The results of this study suggest that many times we will take the route that worked yesterday and ignore the evidence of what normally works best.
“There’s this tension between doing what you should do, at least from a statistical perspective, versus doing what worked out well recently,” said the lead author.
In the study, participants played a simple computer game in which noticing and exploiting patterns could make them more money. The researchers tracked their mouse movements to detect whether they picked up on those patterns.
For example, participants would choose one of two symbols on the top half of the screen—one on the top left and one on the top right. They would then move the cursor to the bottom half of the screen and a symbol would appear on the bottom right or bottom left. They would click on that to see their reward.
Participants repeated this game dozens of times. The researchers could determine if the participants learned the pattern between what they chose at the top and what they got at the bottom (for example, choosing the top left symbol usually led to the bottom right symbol with the largest reward) by watching their mouse movements.
“We could tell where they thought the next symbol was going to appear by where they moved the cursor,” the researchers said. “And we found that nearly everyone—56 of the 57 participants—learned the pattern. That was no problem for our participants.”
But the researchers designed part of the study so that the pattern that usually led to the largest reward didn’t work 10 to 40 percent of the time.
So, the question was: After one of the trials in which the pattern that usually led to the largest reward didn’t work, what would participants do? Would they stick to the pattern or choose something else?
Results showed that participants followed the plan that gave them the best chance of success—which was following the pattern that worked at least 6 out of 10 times—only about 20 percent of the time.
In other parts of the study, the pattern that produced the biggest reward always worked the same way. Here, where the pattern was consistent, participants followed it about twice as often as in the other cases: about 40 percent of the time.
Why don’t people follow the best strategy more often? The researchers said it likely takes a lot of mental energy and planning to always make decisions based on your knowledge of the environment. And the rewards of following the best strategy aren’t always obvious—especially if following that strategy increases your success by only a small percentage, he said.
“It can be hard to judge whether you made a good or bad decision based just on the outcome. We can make a good decision and just get unlucky and have a bad outcome. Or we can make a bad decision and get lucky and have a good outcome,” he added.
In those situations, it is easy for people to stop being disciplined and just choose whatever decision got them rewards most recently.
So, what? This study reinforces the generally-held belief in psychology that people do not make decisions based on facts but rather on habit, emotions or potential relationship advantage.
Do they feel better about themselves when they “go with their gut?” What do they feel is expected of them by those that are important to them? Are they more likely to make that decision, even if those people are not watching?
The fact that we are strongly influenced by recent reward is well established, however this is almost always overturned by the power of habit. This is true even long after those habitual actions have ceased to produce a reward.
More from this issue of TR
People may know the best decision - and not make it
People make decisions based on a “gut feeling,” a habit, or what worked for them last time, rather than on what they have learned will work most often.
How couples weather the COVID-19 financial storm
It’s all very well to “be there” for your partner, but unless you know that that means for them, you’re not going to get very far. We assume we know and, statistically, 90% of the time we don’t.
You might be interested in
Acute stress may slow down the spread of fears
Stress changes the way we deal with risky information. Stressful events, such as a global pandemic, can influence how information and misinformation about health risks spreads in social networks.
Psychology, and psychometrics suffer from WEIRD science.
For decades, the consensus among psychologists (and those who frame psychometric tests) was that a cluster of five personality traits openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion and neuroticism —or a slight variation thereof—universally defines the structure of human personality. However, when the team behind this research studied the Tsimane, an isolated indigenous population in the Bolivian Amazon, they found not five broad dimensions of personality, but two—prosociality and industriousness. Perhaps the Big Five aren’t so universal after all.
Join our tribe
Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.