Money matters to happiness - perhaps more than previously thought
Listen to this article
You know the old saying “Money doesn’t bring happiness.” For a long time, we’ve known that this isn’t really true. However, researchers have said that there is a threshold where the basic elements of a good life—food, shelter etc.—are catered for and above which the extra happiness that more money brings declines rapidly.
But is this true either? What is the relationship between money and well-being? A new study set out to discover the answers.
What the researchers say: “It's one of the most studied questions in my field,” says the lead author of a new study who studies human happiness. “I'm very curious about it. Other scientists are curious about it. Laypeople are curious about it. It's something everyone is navigating all the time.”
To answer this question, the researchers collected 1.7 million data points from more than 33,000 participants who provided in-the-moment snapshots of their feelings during daily life. The paper, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, confirms that money does influence happiness and, contrary to previous influential research on the subject suggesting that this plateaus above $75,000, there was no dollar value at which it stopped mattering to an individual's well-being.
The research was conducted using a technique called experience sampling, which asks people to repeatedly fill out short surveys at randomly selected moments during their day. “It tells us what's actually happening in people's real lives as they live them, in millions of moments as they work and chat and eat and watch TV.”
Most previous studies of the money-happiness link focused on evaluative well-being, which encompasses overall satisfaction with life. But for this study, the lead author aimed to capture both evaluative and experienced well-being, the latter indicating how people feel in the moment.
Through an app he created, people recorded this a few times each day, with check-in times randomized per participant. To measure experienced well-being, each check-in asked them, “How do you feel right now?” on a scale ranging from “very bad” to “very good.” At least once during the process, participants also answered the question, “Overall, how satisfied are you with your life?” on a scale of “not at all” to “extremely.” This measured evaluative well-being.
Secondary measures of experienced well-being included 12 specific feelings, five positive (confident, good, inspired, interested, and proud) and seven negative (afraid, angry, bad, bored, sad, stressed, and upset). Secondary measures of evaluative well-being included two other measures of life satisfaction collected on an intake survey.
“This process provided repeated snapshots of people's lives, which collectively gives us a composite image, a stop-motion movie of their lives,” he says. In total, 33,391 employed, 18- to 65-year-olds in the United States provided 1,725,994 reports of experienced well-being. “Scientists often talk about trying to get a representative sample of the population,” he adds. “I was trying to get a representative sample of the moments of people's lives.”
The researchers then calculated the average level of well-being for each person and analyzed its relationship to people's income. In part, he was trying to confirm the findings of a 2010 paper that suggested that as people earn more money their well-being increases, but experienced well-being plateaus once annual household income hits $75,000.
“It's a compelling possibility, the idea that money stops mattering above that point, at least for how people actually feel moment to moment,” the lead author said. “But when I looked across a wide range of income levels, I found that all forms of well-being continued to rise with income. I don't see any sort of kink in the curve, an inflection point where money stops mattering. Instead, it keeps increasing.”
Here, “income” refers to a concept known as log(income); rather than each dollar mattering the same to each person, each dollar starts to matter less the more a person earns. “We would expect two people earning $25,000 and $50,000, respectively, to have the same difference in well-being as two people earning $100,000 and $200,000, respectively. In other words, proportional differences in income matter the same to everyone.”
Beyond that, the study provides a deeper understanding of the link between income and happiness.
Higher earners are happier, in part, because of an increased sense of control over life, he says. “When you have more money, you have more choices about how to live your life. You can likely see this in the pandemic. People living paycheck to paycheck who lose their job might need to take the first available job to stay afloat, even if it's one they dislike. People with a financial cushion can wait for one that's a better fit. Across decisions big and small, having more money gives a person more choices and a greater sense of autonomy.”
Yet it might be best not to define success in monetary terms, the author said. “Although money might be good for happiness, I found that people who equated money and success were less happy than those who didn't. I also found that people who earned more money worked longer hours and felt more pressed for time.”
Though the study does show that income matters beyond a previously believed threshold, it also showed that a focus on money was detrimental to happiness.
So, what? I think this study is interesting in that it shows that money has an importance that has been underestimated.
However, as the researchers themselves say, there are many elements to happiness apart from money and that income may be the very least of them. Also interesting is the connection they found between money and autonomy—freedom of choice. We have known for a long time that autonomy was important for happiness—it’s one of the CATS (certainty, autonomy, trust, and status) which are our prime motivators.
Money is also tied closely to perception of status and perhaps people striving for ever more money are actually striving for an increase in self-perceived status. The question, not answered in the study, is what is the money/status/autonomy/happiness relationship in different income groups?
Join the discussion
More from this issue of TR
Common workplace interactions can trigger suicidal thoughts
Even perceived low-grade forms of workplace mistreatment, such as avoiding eye contact or excluding a coworker from conversation, can amplify suicidal thoughts in employees with mood disorders.
Are people healthy enough to retire later?
While many people are now enjoying longer, healthier lives, current retirement ages are posing challenges for both policymakers and retirees. One very pertinent question that has surfaced is: how large is the potential to increase working lives further, given people’s health status?
You might be interested inBack to Today's Research
Have "neoliberal" policies, institutions prompted preference for greater inequality?
Neoliberalism, which calls for free-market capitalism, regressive taxation, and the elimination of social services, has become the predominant global socioeconomic framework since the late 1970s.
Reducing inequality is essential in tackling climate crisis
Researchers have found deep-rooted inequalities restrict people’s capacity to switch to lower-carbon behaviors in many ways. Read what they have to say.
Tax incentives for businesses could contribute to the decline of the middle class
America—like other countries—seems hell-bent on destroying its middle class. And since the middle class pays the bulk of the taxes the treasury receives, they may be in the process of destroying the country as well.
Join our tribe
Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.