"Professionalism" linked to unethical behavior
Listen to this article
Employees or managers who view themselves as professional are more vulnerable to unethical behavior such as conflicts of interest, a new Cornell University study finds.
Safeguards from bias are more likely to fail in people with a high self-concept of professionalism, according to the study published in the journal Academy of Management Perspectives.
What the researchers say: “I noticed that many professional advisors, such as financial advisors and physicians, claim that their ‘professionalism’ protects them from corruption and unwanted influence from conflicts of interest; that they can ‘manage their own brains,’” said the study’s author. “However, a large body of social science research shows that much bias from conflicts of interests is unintentional and implicit, and claims of professionalism and integrity do little to protect against unwanted influence.”
The researchers surveyed 400 managers on multiple conflict of interest scenarios, and asked whether they would accept or reject the gift offered in each circumstance. Participants were further asked to imagine they accepted a gift and to predict the influence, if any, it would have on them.
Prior to viewing the scenarios, each respondent’s perception of their own professionalism was measured by assessing their personal view of their ability to remain objective and self-regulate unwanted influence.
“Consistent with our predictions, the greater the managers’ sense of professionalism, the more likely they were to report that they would accept gifts from people with questionable or ambiguous agendas, and less likely to be influenced by the specific gifts in the scenarios,” the researchers wrote. “These overall results indicate that a high sense of professionalism with a shallow understanding of the concept may lead to greater acceptance of conflicts and potentially more bias.”
Professionalism has evolved from a feature of traditional professions, such as medicine and law, to a concept describing how individuals conduct themselves at work.
“I propose that professionalism be redefined not as an individual characteristic or feeling, but as a set of observable repeated behavioral practices that demonstrates a deep understanding of the concept and promotes outcomes in the interest of clients and the societal good,” the lead author said. “Policies and rules need to be combined with positive role models who model deep professionalism and provide education—nurturing virtues of thought—along with opportunities to practice—nurturing virtues of character.”
Further, the concept of deep professionalism could be taught at business schools, the researchers suggested.
“Managers could commit to continuing education and practice to remain competent and ethical,” they said. “Efforts to progress one’s cognitive moral development and empathy would help in understanding one’s limitations and fallibilities. Greater humility and the ability to articulate and acknowledge doubts in relation to conflicts of interests and other ethical problems is critical to developing and maintaining an ethical self.”
So, what? The shift, noted in the “science sips” piece on declining rationality, from a collective to an individualistic outlook goes hand in hand with decreasing ethical behavior. If “I” and “me” are all that matter, then a “professional” mindset is no different from any other. It is equally open to manipulation and ethically questionable behavior.
I disagree with the researchers in one aspect. I think continuing “ethics” education will have no effect so long as we, as a society, believe that our own personal interests are paramount.
Join the discussion
More from this issue of TR
Sales and self: The non-economic value of selling the fruits of one's labor
Individuals offering their self-made products interpret sales as a positive signal from the market, like customers telling them they are skilled and competent producers. Artisans who sell more of their self-made products feel more competent, which in turn makes them happier.
Context-dependent behavior can make cooperation flourish
People can adopt different behaviors depending on the social context they’re in: A person who is generous and caring at home may be cutthroat at work, a self-centered neighbor may be a model of altruism on Twitter. New research shows this context-dependent behavior tends to promote the spread of cooperative behavior across a whole society.
"Professionalism" linked to unethical behavior
Many professional advisors, such as financial advisors and physicians, claim their ‘professionalism’ protects them from corruption and unwanted influence from conflicts of interest; however much bias from conflicts of interests is unintentional and implicit, and claims of professionalism and integrity do little to protect against unwanted influence.
You might be interested inBack to Today's Research
Making spaces on the high street for clothing repair
Sometimes I come across a study which is just so…..human. I relish it and can’t wait to pass it on. This is one of them. The researchers found that making space in high street shops for people to repair clothes could mend the damage caused by fast fashion and transform sewing into a wellbeing activity. Wow!
Feelings of ethical superiority can lead to workplace ostracism, social undermining.
A new study published in the Journal of Business Ethics suggests that your feelings of ethical superiority can lead you to have negative emotions toward a “less ethical” coworker.
Join our tribe
Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.